The Big Think

November 10, 2015

Where Are The Adults at Yale?

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 1:42 pm

Where Are The Adults at Yale? – Tablet Magazine: “…going to college is a challenging experience. And I don’t mean to downplay the difficulties that some students from historically disadvantaged communities may encounter at an institution like Yale, which for most of its history was not a friendly place for minorities of any sort, never mind people of color. But when I hear, in 2015, students complain about feeling ‘marginalized’ at Yale due to their racial, ethnic, religious, sexual, or any other identity—and, on top of this, demanding institutional retribution against those who mildly express viewpoints they don’t agree with and sartorial injunctions on pagan bacchanal holiday garb—I can’t help but think of James Meredith. Meredith was the first black student to attend the segregated University of Mississippi and had to do so under the cover of heavily armed federal marshals. When I see photographs of Meredith and other black students of the civil rights era staring down state-sanctioned American racism—not the rumored antics of inebriated frat boys or emails from well-meaning child developmental psychologists about the propriety of certain Halloween costumes—I don’t see people pleading for Dean’s Excuses so they can huddle in a ‘safe space’ to recover from ‘traumatic racial events.’ I see unbelievably courageous young men and women who, by keeping their heads high, exposed their spittle-flecked antagonists as the bigoted Neanderthals they were and changed this country for the better.”

Compared to the turmoil of the 60’s, the bar for courageous behavior has certainly reached a new low.

November 9, 2015

Health Care

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 1:42 pm

New Yorkers Face Hard Decisions After Collapse of Health Republic Insurance – The New York Times:

“If anyone could manage to obtain treatment under the Affordable Care Act, it should have been Liz Jackson.

With a severe nerve condition that forced her out of a job, Ms. Jackson did not just qualify for a government-subsidized plan, but she also knew her way around the new system, having been trained as a volunteer ‘health care navigator’ to help others sign up.

Yet the collapse of her insurer, Health Republic Insurance of New York — the largest of 12 health care co-ops nationwide set to close this year — has left her and more than 200,000 others in a panic over medical coverage after their plan ceases on Nov. 30.

Health Republic lived a short and difficult existence, squeezed by premiums that were low by design and cut off by Republicans in Congress from government subsidies promised along with the federal health care law.

Ms. Jackson, 33, is in a situation more grim than most of those losing coverage. She said she was told by state health care officials this week that she no longer qualified for subsidies promised under the federal law. Without them, she does not know if she will be able to afford insurance after her Health Republic policy ends.

‘I’m an advocate for the health care law,’ said Ms. Jackson, who lives in Harlem. ‘And if I can’t navigate this, who can?’”

Too bad there was nobody warning that this would happen when the plan was being responsibly debated rammed through Congress on a party line vote.

October 31, 2015

Guess What? You’re Not Actually A Hero

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 8:00 am

Guess What? You’re Not Actually A Hero: “Stop confusing bravery with actions that merely confirm your worldview”

Good article. The author comes at it from a conservative leaning bent but also has some negative things to say about his own side.

October 30, 2015


Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 2:56 pm


The Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks white supremacist groups, suggested in an article last week that the arsons [of six black churches in St. Louis] were carried out by white supremacists.

The group quoted a journalist who covers African-American issues who said that the fires were “both alarming and not surprising.”

“This is alarming because domestic terrorism is alive and well,” David A. Love told the SPLC. “It is such a problem that the U.S. Department of Justice recently predicted increases in violent acts by white extremists who are responding to a new reality in which people of color will become a majority in America.”

The SPLC also quoted Love blaming “a vicious cycle created by rightwing politicians, the NRA and hate groups who stir up anger, fear and resentment over changing demographics and want their country back.”

So people who were looking for news were presented with a pre-framed narrative and interpretation of events.

Today, police announced that they arrested the arsonist and it was quietly reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

Although the locations of the fires in predominantly African American neighborhoods gave rise to speculation that the motive might be race-related, Jackson is black.

But hey, You can trust the media.

October 7, 2015

Alea iacta est

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 7:08 pm


“Occasionally a member of the chattering classes writes something that is not just wrong, that is not just irritating, but that is genuinely dangerous. Matthew Yglesias’s latest essay at Vox is just such a piece. Writes Yglesias:

From her adventures in cattle trading to chairing a policymaking committee in her husband’s White House to running for Senate in a state she’d never lived in to her effort to use superdelegates to overturn 2008 primary results to her email servers, [Hillary] Clinton is clearly more comfortable than the average person with violating norms and operating in legal gray areas.

This is, for him, a point in her favor:

Committed Democrats and liberal-leaning interest groups are facing a reality in which any policy gains they achieve are going to come through the profligate use of executive authority, and Clinton is almost uniquely suited to deliver the goods. More than almost anyone else around, she knows where the levers of power lie, and she is comfortable pulling them, procedural niceties be damned.


She truly is the perfect leader for America’s moment of permanent constitutional crisis: a person who cares more about results than process, who cares more about winning the battle than being well-liked, and a person who believes in asking what she can get away with rather than what would look best.”

Or “we’re okay with someone breaking the law, as long as it’s our person doing it.”

October 1, 2015

The Mob Is Coming For You

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 2:05 pm

VDH: “All consensual governments are prone to scary wild swings of mob-like emotion—and to demagogues who can almost rein in or goad the dêmos. But the Founders sought to make American government immune to Athenian-style craziness through a system of checks and balances that vented popular frenzies without a great deal of damage. If an idea proved illogical or illegal, then legislators, judges, and executives could dissipate, delay, or nullify it, before it swept away years of sober custom and time-honored practices—at least as long as the Constitution and its subsidiary laws were not dismantled as impediments to ‘fairness’ and ‘equality.’

In the twenty-first century, novel developments have increasingly turned us from sober Roman republicans into mercurial Athenian democrats, as we can see especially in this election year.

First, the rise of social media suddenly destroyed most hierarchies of popular expression. Anyone can put up a YouTube video on the Internet and either delight or enrage millions of Americans within seconds—without any journalistic standards, fact-checking, or editorial oversight. The ensuing fury recalls the frenzied rumor-mongering of ancient Athens, when bearers of unpleasant news were often murdered or beaten by mobs at the port of the Piraeus, before their reports could be verified.

Presidential candidates crash or burn in fantastic spurts of public adulation or abject repulsion—predicated not on their policy positions or their past record, but instead on their  television appearances and the degree to which they are ‘trending’ on social media in any given 24-hour period.

Second, we are an increasingly urban people who have lost the sense of self-reliance and autonomy so needed for survival in the countryside and rural communities. Jefferson, more than two centuries ago, warned us that he did not think democracy would work when ‘we get piled upon one another in large cities.’ Fad and frenzy are the wages of centrally controlled, dense populations that look to an omnipotent ‘You Didn’t Build That’ government for their sustenance, safety, and guidance, losing contact with nature and confidence in themselves that accrues from self-reliant achievement.

Third, globalization has expanded America’s supposed responsibility for equality and fairness to all the peoples of the world. Suddenly, it is not enough for the government to provide jobs and opportunities to Americans alone; we must now extend those privileges to illegal immigrants. The Internet and cable TV show us hordes of people scrambling to enter the West—as if we have within our means the instant fixes for such maladies that are the fault of distant others. The plight of gays in the Congo, Christians in Syria, the transgendered in Russia, and the poor in Sudan have become referenda on our morality—and our government must expand and grow, the argument goes, to serve the global disadvantaged.

Finally, the law is seen as an impediment to such sweeping notions of social justice. It is certainly deemed counter-revolutionary and an impediment to the Obama administration’s idea of an equality of result. As a result, the President at one time or another has ignored enforcement of federal laws, from not prosecuting the rogue behavior of federal bureaucrats at the IRS or EPA to suspending elements of his own Affordable Care Act.

Over 300 cities—in antebellum, neo-Confederate fashion—have declared themselves immune from the jurisdiction of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Often detained and deported illegal aliens have been freed by our modern bureaucratic versions of Jefferson Davis nullificationists. Consequently, many released illegal aliens have killed and maimed Americans.

Yet not all of the laws are ignored in quite the same blanket fashion. If San Francisco claims that it does not have to turn over an illegal alien caught in violation of federal immigration law, then can Salt Lake City arbitrarily decide that a particular protected newt or salt-water fish is no longer sacrosanct under the federal Endangered Species Act? Will Fresno be allowed to cancel federal laws that forbid instant purchases of handguns?

What now constitutes actionable criminal behavior in the scandals at the IRS, EPA, ICE, and a host of other alphabet agencies are not treated as per se violations of the law. Rather, they are judged according to whether the offender and his crime were deemed progressive and well-intended—or reactionary and thus prosecutable. CEOs who cannot cap a leaky oil well or who sell noxious peanut products go to jail; EPA functionaries who turn white-water rivers into toxic yellow mush melt back into the coils of the bureaucracy.”

The whole article is worth reading.

September 8, 2015

It’s That Time

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 8:23 am


Crazytown: the current party running against itself and complaining how bad the current economic situation is. Then asking voters to re-elect them to solve it.

Yes, it’s nuts. No, the media will not point it out to voters (as they would if the parties were reversed)

August 24, 2015

There Is No Rational Argument

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 1:00 pm


“Here’s a Tweet from Chris Hayes, an MSNBC host and pro-choice radical:

Better term for ‘anchor babies’ is ‘babies.’ Or, alternately, ‘tiny humans to be cherished and valued.’

— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) August 19, 2015

Tiny humans to be cherished and valued, Chris? I agree. But I think our significant disagreement comes with the application of this concept. You believe the tiny, valuable, cherished humans should be legally eligible for summary execution; I, on the other hand, tend to think ‘cherished’ and ‘valued’ people should be afforded basic protections against torture and murder.

But Chris isn’t the only liberal suddenly discovering an affection for ‘tiny humans’:

They’re called babies.

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 19, 2015

Yes. They’re called babies. Unless they’re in a Planned Parenthood clinic, in which case they are, alternatively, ‘tissue,’ ‘product,’ or ‘profit.’”

The cognitive dissonance on this has been astounding, however, there is hope. As one of my more liberal-leaning friends on FB put it: “I can be progressive politically and still think that Planned Parenthood is killing babies”. So it’s not all progressives that are willing to sweep this very obvious (if you are brave enough to challenge your conclusions and actually watch the videos) tragedy under the rug. The secret is getting out, thankfully. It is becoming more clear that the people who say that PP is doing nothing wrong are self-identifying as the people who have also not watched all the videos. And yes, the unedited versions are available complete online, so the whole “but they’re edited!” meme only works if you don’t want to face the truth. We are allowing the dismemberment of babies as a culture. Not one-or-two-celled blastocysts: fully formed and viable human beings. And we have become inured to it.

God forgive us. No more.

Massive Voter Fraud Discovered in North Carolina’s 2012 Election

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 12:11 am

Massive Voter Fraud Discovered in North Carolina’s 2012 Election | PJ Tatler:

“The North Carolina State Board of Elections has found thousands of instances of voter fraud in the state, thanks to a 28-state crosscheck of voter rolls. Initial findings suggest widespread election fraud.

765 voters with an exact match of first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in N.C. and the other state in the 2012 general election.
35,750 voters with the same first and last name and DOB were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in both states in the 2012 general election.
155,692 voters with the same first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state – and the latest date of registration or voter activity did not take place within N.C.
The second point is key, as double voting is election fraud under state and federal statutes. Punishment for double voting in federal elections can include jail time.

In October 2012, Project Veritas produced video showing a Barack Obama campaign worker helping a voter register to vote in both Texas and Florida.”

One person. One vote. Regardless of outcome. Anything else is not democracy. Anything else should be opposed by all Americans, regardless of party.

August 14, 2015

Abortion Is The New Slavery

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 6:30 pm

Abortion Is The New Slavery – The Federalist:

“The Planned Parenthood videos—and the surrounding debate over the use of fetal tissue—have revealed just how closely abortion parallels the last great moral evil enshrined in American law: slavery. And like that immoral institution, very few of us have clean hands. It’s easy to demonize those directly involved in the practice, but if we refuse to acknowledge the reality of what these videos show us about ourselves, we have no right to condemn our 19th century forebears…

That’s why the undercover Planned Parenthood videos have been so jarring. In no uncertain terms, these doctors and technicians speak of harvesting hearts and livers, lungs and lower extremities. Recognizable human organs are being carefully extracted and their monetary value discussed. There is no plausibility in the argument that this is a donation of the woman’s tissue; it’s patently obvious that the mother isn’t donating her own liver, heart, lungs, or lower extremities. Clearly, like our ancestors before us, we’ve created a class of sub-humanity. These unborn children are human enough to be ‘donors’ of recognizable human organs—but not human enough to enjoy legal personhood. We can kill them at will and use their bodies how we wish. We own them.”

It takes massive amounts of self-deception to come to any other conclusion.

July 29, 2015

Sometimes it’s easier to care about dead lions than dead people

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 5:46 pm

Natural Law holds that all people possess a conscience, therefore all people innately recognize the distinction between good and evil. We are naturally repulsed by evil and attracted to goodness. This is why every civilization has outlawed sins like murder and theft, and hailed virtues like charity and mercy. Of course, many civilizations have redefined murder so as to permit a convenient form of it, but still no society has ever come out and defended murder in principle.

No society can ever be explicitly nihilist. As in, no society can outwardly live by the philosophy that everything is meaningless and nothing matters. Individuals can try it, but like Nietzsche they’ll end up in a mental institution, babbling to themselves while eating their own excrement. Societies, though, have to at least pretend they believe in doing the right thing. A society must convince itself it hates evil and loves goodness. Even the Nazis rationalized that they were serving the greater good of mankind.

So when our culture decides to sit back and tolerate, or even revere and commend, perverse evils like abortion, pornography, the breakdown of the family, the persecution of Christians, etc., it begins to accumulate a kind of Outrage Reservoir. Deep down, we must feel like we oppose evil. We can’t laud the most insidious atrocities of our time, and then look in the mirror and face ourselves honestly. The righteous anger that should be poured out in response to these true horrors is bottled and contained, clogging up our souls like constipated bowels.

We search desperately for an acceptable target for our surplus of withheld scorn, and when we locate it, we unload like we just chugged a gallon of laxative. Suddenly, some guy who killed a lion in Zimbabwe receives all of the compiled disdain that should have been discharged on the abortionists and the pornographers and the persecutors. Our pent up rage and anger mixes with guilt and self-loathing, and together it creates this concentrated bile that drowns and destroys whatever tragic chump they throw before us to be devoured. It’s nothing personal against him, really. Walter Palmer is a sacrificial lamb. A punching bag, strung up and dangled in front of progressive America as a way for them to release their moral frustrations. He’s an object. A receptacle for their misdirected vengeance. It’s like self-flagellation, only minus the self. And next week they’ll be flagellating some other patsy, and nobody will even remember or care about poor old Walter Palmer.

Read the whole thing:

Sometimes it’s easier to care about dead lions than dead people

July 20, 2015

Sleight of Hand

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 10:26 am

The Corker Bill Isn’t a Victory — It’s a Constitutional Perversion | National Review Online:

“To summarize, the Constitution puts the onus on the president to find 67 Senate votes to approve an international agreement, making it virtually impossible to ratify an ill-advised deal. The Corker bill puts the onus on Congress to muster 67 votes to block an agreement.

Under the Constitution, Obama’s Iran deal would not have a prayer. Under the Corker bill, it would sail through. And once again, it would be Republicans first ensuring that self-destruction is imposed on us, then striking the pose of dogged opponents by casting futile nay votes.

This is not how our system works. Congress is supposed to make the laws we live under. It is the first branch of government, not a rubber-stamping Supreme Soviet.

We seem to have forgotten that the point of the Constitution is not to accomplish great things; it is to prevent government from doing overbearing or destructive things. The achievement of great things was left to the genius and ambition of free people confronting challenges without stifling constraints.”

July 16, 2015

The Bad, Worse, & Ugly

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 11:37 pm

Media Coverage of Planned Parenthood’s Organ Harvesting Scandal:

“It’s only been two years since the media struggled to even cover the story of Kermit Gosnell, the abortion doctor and serial murderer. After being shamed into covering the ‘local crime story’ by readers and viewers who had requested coverage for years, the media offered a few mea culpas, and promised to improve coverage of the abortion topic and present the issue more fairly.

They have repeatedly failed, whether the story was cheerleading for late-term abortion supporter Wendy Davis, or accurately covering religious Americans opposition to paying for abortifacients.

This story, however, is so big that it is proceeding even against the wishes of the media and their brethren at Planned Parenthood. As the federal government and state governments prepare to truly investigate Planned Parenthood’s chop shops, let’s hope coverage improves mightily.”

But they’re still insisting that it’s a Choice, not a Calvarium.

July 14, 2015

Behind Closed Doors

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 11:03 am

I actually feel kind of sick postint this:

“A shocking new expose’ video has caught Planned Parenthood’s top doctor describing how the abortion business sells the body parts of aborted babies.

New undercover footage shows Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s Senior Director of Medical Services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola, describing how Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of aborted unborn children and admitting she uses partial-birth abortions to supply intact body parts.

In the video, Nucatola is at a business lunch with actors posing as buyers from a human biologics company. As head of PPFA’s Medical Services department, Nucatola has overseen medical practice at all Planned Parenthood locations since 2009. She also trains new Planned Parenthood abortion doctors and performs abortions herself at Planned Parenthood Los Angeles up to 24 weeks…

The footage shockingly depicts the top medical official at the Planned Parenthood corporation munching on her salad while she discusses the sale of body parts of unborn children victimized by abortions. She brazenly describes how the heads of unborn babies killed in abortions command top dollar.

‘I’d say a lot of people want liver. And for that reason, most providers will do this case under ultrasound guidance, so they’ll know where they’re putting their forceps. The kind of rate-limiting step of the procedure is calvarium. Calvarium—the head—is basically the biggest part.’

Nucatola explains, ‘We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part, I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.’

‘And with the calvarium, in general, some people will actually try to change the presentation so that it’s not vertex,’ she continues. ‘So if you do it starting from the breech presentation, there’s dilation that happens as the case goes on, and often, the last step, you can evacuate an intact calvarium at the end.’

…Nucatola also reveals that Planned Parenthood’s national office is concerned about their liability for the sale of fetal parts.

‘At the national office, we have a Litigation and Law Department which just really doesn’t want us to be the middle people for this issue right now,’ she says. ‘But I will tell you that behind closed doors these conversations are happening with the affiliates.’

…‘Abortionists use ultrasound like a butcher uses scales to sell meat by the pound for profit,’ said Newman in an email to LifeNews. ‘Evidence further shows that Planned Parenthood has gone to great lengths to keep the public from ever knowing about their illicit human body-parts trade, understanding that if news were to leak, it could spell doom for the abortion giant.’”

You don’t say.

It’ll be interesting to hear what clever protests or reasoning the pro-abortion side has for this practice and how it’ll play out in the press. The only defense is brazenness… oh, who am I kidding. Think this’ll get any traction? Stay tuned, but don’t hold your breath.

July 8, 2015

Put Up or Shut Up

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 8:35 am

A Modest Proposal for the New York Times:

“Everyone knows Margaret Thatcher’s quip about socialism: sooner or later, you run out of other people’s money. Sooner or later, and it is looking more and more like it might be sooner, the Germans are going to run out of money to pay for the Greeks’ lavish pension plans and retirement schemes.

But all is not lost. The sums Greece wants are quite large, it is true, but every little bit can make a difference.  And, as Mr. Krugman & Co. would be the first to insist, this a moral imperative. There’s bleeding going on. It must be stopped. People have to take a stand. So here’s my modest proposal. When the markets open today, The New York Times should shift their entire pension portfolio into Greek bonds, beginning with whatever holdings Messrs. Cohen, Krugman, and members of the editorial board may have.  It may be an adventurous investment, but, hey, were talking about medicines and imported food on the supermarket shelves in Athens. What an edifying spectacle: rancid lefties at a once-important paper put their money—their own money, for once—where their loud mouths are.

By itself, the Times won’t make a big difference. But what an example! And perhaps—we can only hope!—other left-wing organizations will follow suit and, instead of trying to spend your money or the Germans’ money, they will invest their own money in Greek bonds, thus showing the world that they are really serious about economic redistribution.  What started as a trickle from the office of The New York Times may become a raging current of altruistic investment in a real-life socialist utopia. ‘The important thing now,’ Mr. Krugman says, ‘is to do whatever it takes to end the bleeding.’ Let’s start with his own savings and pension as the first bandaid.”

Hey, it’s only fair. What’s that you say, Dr. Krugman? You don’t want to risk your personal portfolio of retirement funds on a no-win financial situation? Then why are you telling governments to risk their taxpayer’s money?

July 3, 2015

Generation Hugbox

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 9:18 pm

Trigger Warning – Generation Hugbox: “Once upon a time classical liberalism was known for advocating free speech, free thinking, open discourse, and challenging dogmas. In the modern use, liberals are associated with the sexual revolution and freedom of alternative lifestyle. These days, liberalism has become something altogether different. It has become the very thing it once hated, and it is not even aware of this change.”

(Via .)

July 2, 2015


Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 8:05 am

Investigators find proof IRS destroyed evidence in targeting scandal:

“‘We’ve confirmed the backup tapes no longer exist,’ Koskinen said. He maintained Lerner destroyed the hard drive on the computer and no additional information could be retrieved.

Despite a subpoena order to provide documents, IRS employees working night shifts demagnetized the contents of Lerner’s’ computers, according to the inspectors general.”

The Justice Department has refused to press charges. This will be minimally covered by the media, and nobody will go to prison.

Nixon was a schmuck.

June 30, 2015

Nonprofits and Civil Society

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 4:42 pm

Nonprofits and Civil Society: “Yes, Churches that Oppose Gay Marriage Should Still Get Tax Breaks”

In a conversation the other day I suggested that it wouldn’t be too long before we started seeing the earnest call to remove churches’ tax exempt status. Just a few days later, it has begun. This article proves the unmanageability of such a suggestion.

June 29, 2015

Trust Us

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 10:11 pm

US Caves to Iran, Drops Key Demand to Inspect Nuclear Sites: “…the US has agreed to Iran’s demand to drop inspections of nuclear sites from any final deal over its nuclear program. The goal of the talks involving Iran and the US, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia is a deal that would limit Tehran’s ability to produce nuclear weapons in exchange for sanctions relief.

According to the New York Times, Iran’s leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final word on all public matters in Iran, demanded that most sanctions be lifted before Tehran has dismantled part of its nuclear infrastructure and before international inspectors verify that the country is beginning to meet its commitments.

He also ruled out any freeze on Iran’s sensitive nuclear enrichment for as long as a decade, and he repeated his refusal to allow inspections of Iranian military sites.

Reports have also surfaced that US President Barack Obama has sent a private letter to Iran’s leadership. Its contents have yet to be disclosed.”

The entire civilized world is screaming at the top of its’ lungs to this administration: “YOU’RE BEING PLAYED! DON’T BE FOOLS!” Yet somehow, somehow, they don’t see it. Or don’t want to. This will end badly.

Sow the Wind

Filed under: Politics — jasony @ 3:24 pm

Orthodox Christians Must Now Learn To Live as Exiles in Our Own Country: “we have to accept that we really are living in a culturally post-Christian nation. The fundamental norms Christians have long been able to depend on no longer exist. To be frank, the court majority may impose on the rest of the nation a view widely shared by elites, but it is also a view shared by a majority of Americans. There will be no widespread popular resistance to Obergefell. This is the new normal.

For another, LGBT activists and their fellow travelers really will be coming after social conservatives. The Supreme Court has now, in constitutional doctrine, said that homosexuality is equivalent to race. The next goal of activists will be a long-term campaign to remove tax-exempt status from dissenting religious institutions. The more immediate goal will be the shunning and persecution of dissenters within civil society. After today, all religious conservatives are Brendan Eich, the former CEO of Mozilla who was chased out of that company for supporting California’s Proposition 8 [a legal position, remember, that was supported by a majority of Californians and only overturned by judicial decree].

Third, the Court majority wrote that gays and lesbians do not want to change the institution of marriage, but rather want to benefit from it. This is hard to believe, given more recent writing from gay activists like Dan Savage expressing a desire to loosen the strictures of monogamy in all marriages. Besides, if marriage can be redefined according to what we desire — that is, if there is no essential nature to marriage, or to gender — then there are no boundaries on marriage. Marriage inevitably loses its power.

In that sense, social and religious conservatives must recognize that the Obergefell decision did not come from nowhere. It is the logical result of the Sexual Revolution, which valorized erotic liberty. It has been widely and correctly observed that heterosexuals began to devalue marriage long before same-sex marriage became an issue. The individualism at the heart of contemporary American culture is at the core of Obergefell — and at the core of modern American life.

This is profoundly incompatible with orthodox Christianity. But this is the world we live in today.”

To the “free to be, you and me” Boomer generation, this is the result of 1960’s let-your-freak-flag-fly no-penalty thinking. Note that this is not the end result. It’s simply a stop along the journey. Where does this train lead? One thing you can be absolutely certain of: it won’t stop at your own personal definition of enough. Sooner or later society will speed past what you personally consider to be ‘far enough’ and go rocketing off into the darkness. When people say “oh! but now things are bad!”, please remember those of us that stressed rule of law and strict reading of legal language as opposed to the dangerous “intentional interpretation” that we’ve gotten lately. Laws must be interpreted according to the actual language (“lawyer speak” that, for all its obtuseness, has evolved specifically to make things clear and incontrovertible). Once judges begin interpreting and enforcing laws based not on the words but on the perceived intent of the writers, then we enter into a very dangerous area where what IS can be manufactured easily from what we WANT, not from what is clearly written (see: King v. Burwell).

From this article:

“The majority’s decision is an act of will, not legal judgment. The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or this Court’s precedent,” Roberts writes in his dissent. “Just who do we think we are?”

However, the chief justice also seemed to recognize that this was a landmark decision, which would likely be viewed positively in the future.

Writing that he has “no choice but to dissent,” Roberts made it clear that his decision was based in the “restrained conception of the judicial role,” rather than a personal view of the definition of marriage. As he writes:

Understand well what this dissent is about: It is not about whether, in my judgment, the institution of marriage should be changed to include same-sex couples. It is instead about whether, in our democratic republic, that decision should rest with the people acting through their elected representatives, or with five lawyers who happen to hold commissions authorizing them to resolve legal disputes according to law. The Constitution leaves no doubt about the answer…

…”Those who founded our country would not recognize the majority’s conception of the judicial role … They would never have imagined yielding that right on a question of social policy to unaccountable and unelected judges.”

Many people will rejoice at this decision, and I begrudge none their celebration …

If you are among the many Americans — of whatever sexual orientation — who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.

If you get what is to you a right result but obtain it using a terrible means, do not be surprised when that same means is used against you to further what you thought to be enough well past that point.

Wind. Whirlwind.

UPDATE: A prescient article from not too long ago.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress